The exposure of workers to job displacement by artificial intelligence (AI) has been a topic of interest for several years. Sam Manning & Tomás Aguirre of The Centre for the Governance of AI, joined by Mark Muro and Shriya Methkupally of Brookings Metro, have charted such exposure against workers’ adaptive capacity, i.e. their ability to navigate job displacement. The result is a measure of overall occupational vulnerability to AI disruption. Their work has been shared in a September 2025 PDF as well as a January 2026 online report.
Oklahoma was found to be in the top ten states with the greatest concentration of workers highly vulnerable to job disruption by AI. The Sooner State has 84,274 folks, comprising 4.4% of its workforce, who are in the top quartile of AI exposure and bottom quartile in adaptive capacity.
Two of Oklahoma’s metropolitan statistical areas were among the top 40 nationwide in the share of workers in high-vulnerability occupations: the college towns of Stillwater and Ada.
College towns, state capitals, and small towns in New Mexico and Oklahoma have the highest vulnerability shares in the study due to their “concentrations of administrative and clerical positions supporting institutional employers like universities, state government offices, and regional service centers.”
You can access an interactive version of that map of 927 metropolitan and micropolitan areas showing the shares of workers in the top quartile for AI exposure and bottom quartile for adaptive capacity among 356 occupations. 6.1 million workers nationwide fall into that category of high vulnerability. The Bartlesville micropolitan area has 4.32% exposure.
A scatterplot of adaptive capacity versus AI exposure by occupation is available in interactive form, with the size of the dots proportional to each occupation’s total nationwide employment.
Table 5 shows the 50 largest occupations by employment. Pay attention to the final two columns. High “AI Exp.” and low “AC” indicate high vulnerability.
[Source]Sarcastically crafted using the Google Gemini AI
Given the dominance of the Republican party, most of Oklahoma’s elections in November 2026 will effectively be determined in the closed Republican primaries in June and any runoff primaries in August. While over half of our registered voters are now Republican, most of them don’t actually vote in the elections that truly count. I anticipate that perhaps 1/3 of registered voters, or perhaps 1/7 of the state’s voting age population, could determine most statewide elected offices, along with six out of seven seats in Congress, months before the general election.
When I came of voting age in 1984, Oklahoma’s congressional delegation and state government were still dominated by Democrats. The OK Voter Portal shows that I voted in 67 elections in the 21st century, and I reckon that over the past 42 years I’ve been to polling places about 150 times. However, our general elections lost most of their competitiveness over 15 years ago.
I was part of the minority of junior high kids who actually enjoyed Oklahoma History, and I was the kind of student who noticed this certificate’s lack of subject-verb agreement
As a student of Oklahoma’s history, I know that Democratic dominance in 20th century Oklahoma was boosted by both racism and populism. Bear in mind that Democrats were the Jim Crow party after the Civil War, in sharp contrast to the party’s racial politics after 1965.
Agrarian left-wing populism amongst working farmers and laborers also aligned with the Democratic party’s reform-minded, pro-labor, and anti-corporate platform. In 1907, the Oklahoma Constitution was longer than any of those adopted by the earlier 45 states. It was drafted mostly by farmers, with some laborers and lawyers, presided over by the colorful and rabidly racist “Alfalfa Bill” Murray. It reflected Progressive Era ideals, direct democracy, and extensive business regulation with statutory-level details that would lead to over 150 voter-approved amendments by 2026.
Alfalfa Bill on the dais at the far left at the Constitutional Convention in Guthrie in November 1906
The Democratic party held 81% of the state’s legislative seats between 1907 and 1973, and its power was nearly absolute during most of the 1930s. A Republican did not win a gubernatorial election until 1963, and even then only 19% of Oklahoma voters registered as Republicans. However, Oklahoma’s conservatism also led it to give its Electoral College votes to Republican presidential candidates from 1952 onward, save for Lyndon Johnson in 1964.
Johnson’s support for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965 triggered a white backlash that began to shift the state’s political alignment, with Republicans undertaking real efforts at organization statewide.
Oklahoma’s shift from Democratic to Republican control
Until the 1990s, most of the state’s delegation in the U.S. House of Representatives were still Democrats, but the realignment of Evangelical Christian voters toward the GOP allowed state Republican party chairs to target divisions between socially conservative Oklahoma voters and the national Democratic Party.
Conservatives now outnumber liberals by 2:1 in Oklahoma, and Evangelical Protestants dwarf all other religious groups. However, the increasing politicization of Christian churches has alienated conservatives from the aging and ever-shrinking mainline denominations while many moderates and liberals have fled Evangelical churches.
Oklahoma is still in the Bible Belt, but the religious composition chart also documents an increase in the religiously unaffiliated from 12% in 2007 to 26% in 2024, driven both by political alienation as well as an erosion of belief.
Oklahoma’s declining religiosity still leaves it with a huge block of Evangelical Protestants and thus a greater share of adherents and sympathizers of Christian Nationalism than all other states save Arkansas, Mississippi, and West Virginia.
In the late 20th century there were still some healthy Democratic primaries for statewide offices. However, by 2010 the Republicans controlled the state legislature, governorship, and almost all statewide offices. Since 2020 the entire Congressional delegation has also been Republican. Donald Trump won every county in the state in the 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential elections, whereas all other states had at least one county that favored the Democratic nominee.
Oklahoma is ranked 47th in political engagement with a lack of competitive races at the state level, disillusionment of young voters, and a general lack of motivation to vote. In June 2022, only 24% of registered voters participated in the Democratic and Republican gubernatorial primaries, and only 18% of registered voters participated in the March 2024 Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian primaries, even with Independents being allowed to vote in the Democratic primary that year, ensuring that every registered voter statewide was eligible to cast a ballot.
When I came of voting age, USA voters were fairly evenly split across Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. However, Independents drew sharply ahead of either party after 2008, driven by dissatisfaction with the handling of the Great Recession of 2008, disillusionment with the two-party system, and heightened political polarization.
A petition drive for State Question 836 aimed to eliminate Oklahoma’s closed primaries, but it failed to gather enough signatures to be scheduled for a vote of the people. Currently only Republicans can vote in their primaries, and while Democrats allowed Independents to participate in theirs from 2016 to 2025, their primaries will be closed in 2026 and 2027. The Independents who show up for the June 16, 2026 primary election will still have something to vote on, however, since Oklahoma’s conservative governor strategically scheduled State Question 832 on raising the minimum wage for the primary election date in order to suppress support for it.
Realpolitik says that, except in some metropolitan areas, Independents in Oklahoma who want their vote to count should register as Republicans and then vote in their closed primaries and primary runoffs. However, most people neither think nor act strategically.
Consider Oklahoma’s party registrations from 1960 to 2026. Over that period, Democratic registrations fell from 82% to 25%, Republican ones grew from 18% to 53%, Libertarians grew to 1%, and Independents grew from 0.4% to 20%.
The Republicans outnumbered the Democrats after 2015, but the Independents are also coming on strong and in a few years could outnumber the Democrats, despite their registration ensuring they have little actual influence on which candidates are elected to office.
The partisan imbalance and low turnouts in the crucial primary contests have led to an Oklahoma legislature that is ever more extreme in its right-wing partisanship. That in turn has created friction when the more moderate electorate has opted to use initiative petitions to bypass the legislature in legalizing medical marijuana, expanding Medicaid, and converting low-level drug and property crimes from felonies to misdemeanors. Given the persistent trends, I expect that dissonance to continue to build for some time.
Do you find yourself spending too much time scrolling on Facebook past random nonsense? Does your inbox get clogged with emails of fresh posts from different online services? If so, here are a couple of strategies that might improve your online experience.
Facebook Friends Feed
Recently my default newsfeed on Facebook has been filled with stories from various groups that represent minor, sometimes very minor, interests of mine that the service has gleaned from untold number of cookies and signals across various services. Too many entries are written by artificial intelligence, with telltale signals in phrasing, wordy repetition of main points, and annoying punchy, upbeat summary paragraphs.
The best solution I’ve found is to switch to the Friends Feed as shown here for the mobile app or on the website with this link. (To find it on the web version, I had to click See more in the left sidebar, select Feeds, and then select Friends.) You’ll still get plenty of ads, but far less algorithmic content.
Avoid the default feed on Facebook; use the Friends Feed instead
A Substack Problem
Substack’s emails can have terrible formatting that fails to distinguish an excerpt from an earlier column
I don’t care for Substack’s website nor app interfaces, but it will gladly email me new posts from those columnists. I could use those to read the articles, but they tend to pile up in my inbox, and the emails I receive have the same drawback I’ve seen in some posts on their website and app.
In an attempt to promote traffic, Substack often inserts a headline, graphic, and initial paragraph from an earlier, related post by the same writer within each post. However, they stupidly (or connivingly) use the same identical formatting for those “previews” and the post I’m trying to read. If they would just color the background differently for the previews, I wouldn’t be so annoyed.
However, I found a solution, and it was an old one, in web terms: RSS.
RSS
Really Simple Syndication, or RSS, is a standardized web feed format that allows users to subscribe to and receive automatic updates from websites, blogs, and news sources. It acts as an efficient way to track new content, such as articles or podcast episodes, in one centralized “feed reader” without visiting each site individually. As Cory Doctorow pointed out, “This conduit is anti-lock-in, it works for nearly the whole internet. It is surveillance-resistant, far more accessible than the web or any mobile app interface. It is my secret super-power.”
RSS was first introduced around 1999 by Netscape, if you even know what Netscape was. I once used RSS to populate one of the windows in my old iGoogle web browser default home page, a web portal that Google started offering in 2005 and discontinued in 2013 as part of its continual process of creating and then killing useful services.
I hadn’t consciously used an RSS feed in a decade or so, but Doctorow motivated me to seek out a new reader. As a Mac and iOS user, I chose the open source NetNewsWire. If I were still using Windows at home, I would check out some of Zapier’s recommendations, such as Feedly, which is free for up to 100 feeds.
The great news is that adding feeds to NetNewsWire is usually dead simple. I can often just visit a website of interest, highlight its web address URL and hit CTRL+C to copy that, click the + icon at the top of the sidebar in NetNewsWire, and hit CTRL+V to paste in the URL. For most sites, that is all it needs to figure out the RSS feed and create a new entry in my feeds group.
There are some sites that don’t work with RSS, while for others a web search for a RSS feed URL may get them working. For example, I could not get the feed for Oklahoma Voice to work using their default web address, but a Google search for “Oklahoma Voice RSS” told me https://oklahomavoice.com/feed/ would work. Being a persistent experimenter, I also discovered that https://oklahomavoice.com/category/education/feed/ would allow me to only see their education posts.
I quickly added feeds to my new RSS reader
I added the NetNewsWire app to my iPad and managed to turn on an iCloud group and shift my saved feeds into that to keep everything synced across my Mac and iPad. The program also allows one to create folders to group related feeds if you go hog wild or just have an organizational streak.
I was delighted to discover that reading Substack posts with the RSS reader stripped entries of the confusing inserts, and it is certainly easier to skim through and read articles of interest with NetNewsWire than opening individual emails.
I was disappointed to find that I couldn’t find useful RSS feeds for my Patreon accounts, as that platform’s user interfaces are abysmal. While Patreon can support audio-only podcast feeds, I wanted a feed of all posts for a given creator since I read Bloom County comics there, watch TechMoan‘s Video Oddcasts for patrons, and the like, but no dice.
So good old RSS can’t solve everything, but it can solve some things.
The mass market paperback is dead. Not all paperback books, mind you, for the larger and more expensive trade paperbacks are still with us. But it shook me to realize that the pocket paperback, which was so important in my life until 2008, is now extinct.
A story related by Smithsonian is that back in the mid-1930s, Allen Lane, chairman of the British publishing house Bodley Head, spent a weekend in the country with Agatha Christie. While in a train station, worrying about how to keep his business afloat amidst the Great Depression, he browsed for something to read, but struck out, only finding trendy and pulp magazines. That gave him an idea.
Sir Allen Lane of Penguin Books
Lane used his own capital to found the Penguin publishing house, acquired the rights to reprints of some literary titles, and worked to place his titles in places other than bookstores, with Woolworth’s an early customer. His paperbacks were cheap, costing the same as a pack of cigarettes, and their reduced size required fresh typesetting. Penguin started with 10 titles, and it had to sell 17,000 copies of each book to break even. That wasn’t a problem: in its first year, Penguin sold over three million books.
The U.S. adopted the model in 1938 with Pocket Books, starting out by selling Pearl Buck’s The Good Earth in Macy’s. World War II popularized pocket books with soldiers via Armed Services Editions, with nearly 123 million copies of 1,300 titles being distributed. That revived interest in The Great Gatsby, helping make it the great American novel. 1925’s Gatsby had sold fewer than 25,000 copies by the time Fitzgerald died in 1940, but 155,000 copies of it were distributed during the war, and it is estimated that those copies were read and passed along an average of seven times each.
A rare surviving Armed Services Edition of Fitzgerald’s Great American Novel
Penguin’s pocket size books were 4 3/8 by 7 1/8 inches, while the US ones were often 4 1/4 by 6 7/8 inches with some variations in height, while the width remained stable to fit in the wire racks used to display their cover art. At one time, over 600 independent distributor wholesalers were delivering them to 100,000 outlets where magazines and newspapers were for sale, including newsstands, variety stores, gas stations, and supermarkets. School book fairs, book clubs, and bookmobiles also helped bring paperbacks to students and teachers, from a variety of publishers.
Trashy 1954 hillbilly noir
In 1950, Fawcett began publishing original fiction in mass-market paperback form, instead of just reprints. Cheap paperbacks followed with lurid covers for detective, romance, science, and western fiction printed on cheap, high-acid wood pulp paper. Such works were hurriedly written, fast paced, and often featured exploitative elements.
I have used Open Library to read some fun trash by the ‘King of the Pulps’ Harry Whittington, who churned out hardboiled crime, mystery, western, erotica, and slavesploitation for cheap paperbacks from the late 1940s into the 1980s. Whittington published over 200 novels under at least 17 pseudonyms as well as his own name, including 85 in a span of only a dozen years. He once managed to write seven novels in a month.
A slump in the science fiction market in 1959 led author Robert Silverberg to switch to other genres for awhile, writing two books per month for one publisher, another book each month for a second publisher, and churning out about 200 erotic novels under a pseudonym. Motivated by mortgage payments, he reportedly could write 250,000 words each month. When I was in junior high, one of the neighborhood kids snuck a couple of erotic mass market pulps out of his father’s den, and we pored over them for extracurricular education, as they were more explicit than my mother’s and my aunts’ Harlequin romance novels and far more exciting than the Life Cycle Library my parents had purchased for my edification and enculturation.
Most of the pulp magazines had collapsed in the late 1950s, done in by both pulp paperback novels as well as television, with only a few digest-sized science fiction and mystery mags hanging on.
I remember large racks of pocket-size mass market paperbacks in discount stores and airport shops. Their heyday was from the late 1960s into the mid 1990s. $657 million in sales in 1975 rose to $811 million in 1979, handily beating hardcovers and the newer trade paperback format.
In the US, unlike the mass market paperbacks which at least had a standard width, trade paperbacks came in a variety of sizes. Two of the more common ones were 5 1/2 by 8 1/2 inch “digest” books and 6 by 9 inch “standard trade” editions. The trades featured better paper, thicker covers, and the same typesetting used in hardcover editions, and were once priced much higher than the cheap mass market pocket paperbacks.
By the late 1970s, if I couldn’t find what I wanted at the school or public libraries, I would spend allowance money on books at Tag Kimberling’s Henry Higgins bookstore in our neighborhood shopping center. That was my introduction to trade paperbacks, but they were too costly for me, with even the smaller mass market books having undergone outsize price inflation. Originally priced at a quarter, mass market paperbacks had risen to $1.50+ by the mid-1970s and by 1982 were costing $2-$4, whereas the consumer price index had only inflated $0.25 in 1950 to $1 by 1982.
Relatively cheap mass market paperbacks were crucial in nurturing and deepening my youthful obsession with Star Trek, from the glimpses into its production provided by The Making of Star Trek and The World of Star Trek to Alan Dean Foster’s adaptations of the animated series in his Star Trek Log series. I also collected 11 of James Blish’s 12 adaptations of the original series shows, but they were based on early scripts and thus differed so much from the broadcast versions that they were just works-in-progress curiosities to me.
1970s mass market paperbacks nurtured and deepened my love for Star Trek
Reading a mass market paperback often created creases in its spine, the acidic pulp paper gradually turned yellow-brown, and if there were photo inserts those played havoc on the book’s durability as the glue aged and cracked.
A 1975 Space:1999 Pocket paperback with telltale signs of age
These mass market reprints that I purchased and read in 7th grade changed my life
Despite the format’s limitations, three mass market paperbacks profoundly changed my life in seventh grade. They were reprints of Isaac Asimov’s Understanding Physics, and they set me on a path that led six years later to a couple of years of college physics courses and then 28 years of teaching high school physics.
I stuck with mass markets in my purchases until Asimov’s Foundation’s Edge science fiction novel came out in June 1982, almost 30 years after his original Foundation trilogy, itself formed from eight short stories and novellas originally published in the Astounding Science Fiction magazine from 1942 to 1950. The sequel was only available in hardcover, and while I loved the 1950s trilogy, I debated for weeks before coughing up $14.95 for the sequel, since that was as much as four or five mass market books. I didn’t see a mass market paperback edition of it until November 1983.
Someone growing up now with e-books would probably think it strange how more prestigious books were once released over many months in a sequence from high-priced hardcovers to trade paperbacks to mass market paperback reprints, similar to my surprise when I first learned about the serialized novels of Dickens and the subscription system for Mark Twain’s works.
Many of my purchases were Bantam books, which had been formed by Ian Ballantine in 1945. He convinced Bennett Cerf of Random House, John O’Connor of Grosset & Dunlap, Charles Scribner, and Meredith Wood of the Book of the Month Club to become Bantam’s Board of Directors and roll their hardcovers into Bantam paperback reprints. They required new typesetting for the reduced size, which likely worried some readers that they were abridged. I remember how the copyright pages always stated, “This low-priced Bantam Book contains the complete text of the original hard-cover edition. NOT ONE WORD HAS BEEN OMITTED.”
The inevitable friction with the major publishers eventually led to Ballantine being fired from Bantam, and he and his wife, Betty, then formed their own publishing house. In addition to Bantam, I remember buying mass market paperbacks published by Ballantine, Dell, Del Rey, Pocket, and Signet.
Ace doubles were a fascinating variant
I was fascinated by the Ace doubles that one of my uncles had purchased and passed down to me. Those were tête-bêche format books published from 1952 to 1973. Each contained two novellas, with the front cover and interior of one novella rotated by 180 degrees and bound back-to-back with the front cover and interior of the other. Gardner’s Used Books in Tulsa once had a sizable collection of them.
Mass market paperbacks were once all the rage
Mass market paperbacks helped make Danielle Steel the fourth best-selling fiction author of all time
In 1987, 112 mass market titles sold more than one million copies each, led by Danielle Steel, who sold almost 12 million copies of three of her titles. However, by 1996 mass market sales were beginning to decline, although they still racked up $1.35 billion.
In 2001, eight mass market paperbacks sold more than two million copies each and another 39 sold over a million. However, the number of independent distributor wholesalers was collapsing, consolidating under Levy Home Entertainment, which became ReaderLink in 2011. By then, mass market paperback sales were plummeting, nearly matching the rising amount of e-book sales, and only six paperback titles sold more than a million copies each.
My first Kindle back in 2008, with a mix of hardcovers, trade paperbacks, and over a dozen mass market paperbacks visible on the shelves
Back in 2017, Publishers Weekly wasn’t sure if the mass market paperback was enduring an incredibly slow death or had begun to stabilize. Mass market titles were 13% of print sales in 2013, falling to 9% in 2016. That trend kept going, and mass market book sales dropped from 131 million in 2004 to 21 million by 2024, an 84% collapse.
They were displaced by e-books, smartphones, and more profitable trade paperbacks, and to make money on the falling sales, their cover prices kept inflating to what had once been trade paperback prices. In 2025, Hudson stopped carrying them in its airport stores, and ReaderLink, which grew to become the largest book distributor in the USA, stopped distributing mass market paperbacks at the end of 2025. The Guardian commented how that marked “the end of a format that once democratized reading for the working class”.
I was part of that change. Back in grade school, I always had a paperback on me to read when I finished my class work early, and for years I still had one on me, or a print magazine, when dining alone in restaurants, never being one to cook. However, in 2008 I started carrying a Kindle, and for several years wait staff and other customers would gawk and ask about it.
Most of my few surviving mass market paperbacks
In 2016 I donated 700 books, including hundreds of mass market science fiction paperbacks, to the local public library. Only a select few survived the culling, and now the very format they represent is extinct. That is a loss, given that even today’s teenagers reportedly have a strong preference for affordable paperbacks, but market forces have eliminated a once-inexpensive option. Thank goodness for used bookstores and library sales, where the fossils of the extinct format can still be dug up.
When reading book reviews and blurbs, I bear in mind the disclaimer I often heard in 1970s car commercials: your mileage may vary. A few weeks ago I read Gary Shteyngart’s May 2024 article in The Atlantic: “Crying Myself to Sleep on the Biggest Cruise Ship Ever“. I enjoyed it, although it could not compete with David Foster Wallace’s “A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again“, which originated in a 1996 article for Harper’s titled “Shipping Out”. Wallace set the standard for writers forced to suffer through a boat cruise.
Looking for a new Kindle read, I noticed that I had Shteyngart’s Super Sad True Love Story from 2010 marked as Read in my Kindle, although I had not logged it at LibraryThing or Goodreads. The character names seemed familiar, but the plot summary on Wikipedia did not, so maybe that was a Did Not Finish before I created such a list in Goodreads.
I decided to scout around for other Shteyngart novels and came upon Lake Success, which was a bestselling work with these incredibly abridged blurbs: “Spectacular.” -NPR, “Uproariously funny.” -The Boston Globe, “An artistic triumph.” -San Francisco Chronicle, “A novel in which comedy and pathos are exquisitely balanced.” -The Washington Post, “Shteyngart’s best book.” -The Seattle Times.
AND…it was named one of the best books of 2018 by Maureen Corrigan on NPR’s Fresh Air and The New York Times Book Review, NPR, The Washington Post, O: The Oprah Magazine, Mother Jones, Glamour, Library Journal, Kirkus Reviews, etc.
AND…it received a Salon Book Award, a Bollinger Everyman Wodehouse Prize, and was one of Amazon’s Best Books of the Month in August 2010. As for relative ranks, while composing this post I found it ranked as the 11,518th Greatest Book of All Time at The Greatest Books, with four of Shteyngart’s other novels ranked higher. Super Sad True Love Story was in the lead at 3,055th.
Well, okay, but Lake Success is about a multi-millionaire New York investment banker who goes on a road trip to escape a failing marriage and an approaching indictment. I knew that I, as an underpaid Oklahoma educator who is happily married and free of legal jeopardy, would not be likely to relate to the lead character, but the book was promoted as being funny, so…maybe?
I read the free Kindle sample and was gripped by the first part of the opening chapter, in which the unlikable banker struggles to get a ticket on a Greyhound bus out of New York as his odd way of fleeing the metropolis and his troubles. What I did not know was that in addition to his investment banking errors, he was fleeing from his wife and their young autistic son, nor that he would turn out to be a dim but successfully gregarious character who has some characteristics some might associate with autism.
Soon after I had purchased the book and read onward, the wife appeared in the story. She would pursue a relationship with a fake Latino writer who lived in the same garishly expensive Manhattan high rise, although he and his doctor wife’s third-floor apartment only cost $4.1 million in 2015, compared to the banker’s 4,000 square foot one up on the 21st floor which cost five times more. Let’s see…adjusting for inflation, that’s well over 100 Meador Manors.
What I soon noticed was that I did not like any of the main characters. They were all repulsive, engineered to empower various wry observations and parodic satires. I didn’t find anything “uproariously funny”, although before quitting the book 1/3 of the way in, I did highlight this paragraph about a Richmond restaurant:
The noisy restaurant the Hayeses had chosen looked like it had been tractor-trailered in from the part of Brooklyn where Seema’s funny Asian friend (Tina?) lived. There were gilded Victorian mirrors, drawings of horses, and a giant, pointless map of Latin America. Bearded bartenders were slinging tiki drinks, and the young clientele was in full possession of their looks.
The Did Not Finish killing blow was my going on a walk in a park on an unseasonably warm winter afternoon, listening to John Hodgman’s Vacationland. He essayed about a Maine summer home, repeatedly mentioning how a famous writer had once lived nearby:
That summer I thought about the famous writer in a new way. It won’t surprise you to know that he is white, and he wrote about the rhythms of his life in this white place. There is nothing wrong in this: all places and experiences deserve writing about. But what made the writer a greater hero to me in that moment was, unlike so many white men, he wasn’t braggy. He never suggested that his experience was heroic, or correct, or even unusual. In fact, it was profoundly usual, beautifully mundane, and merely his to offer. His offering was his insight into the small joys of his particular life, which by extension could help us recognize the small joys that exist everywhere, even outside of Maine. And he offered it humbly. You really should use your detective skills and find his work. He’s great.
Well, I had already deduced that Hodgman was referring to the co-author of The Elements of Style and the sole author of Stuart Little and Charlotte’s Web: E. B. White. I’ve only read the story of the spider and “some pig”, and that was five decades ago in a school building that itself would perish thirty years later. Some day I’ll perish too, and might my limited time be better invested in some essays by E. B. White than in Shteyngart’s horrid characters?
I spent a whopping $2 on Essays of E. B. White, which he had compiled in 1977, sharing:
The arrangement of the book is by subject matter or by mood or by place, not by chronology. Some of the pieces in the book carry a dateline, some do not. Chronology enters into the scheme, but neither the book nor its sections are perfectly chronological. Sometimes the reader will find me in the city when he thinks I am in the country, and the other way round. This may cause a mild confusion; it is unavoidable and easily explained. I spent a large part of the first half of my life as a city dweller, a large part of the second half as a countryman. In between, there were periods when nobody, including myself, quite knew (or cared) where I was: I thrashed back and forth between Maine and New York for reasons that seemed compelling at the time. Money entered into it, affection for The New Yorker magazine entered in. And affection for the city.
I have finally come to rest.
That beckons to me, while I personally related to this part of his Foreward:
There are as many kinds of essays as there are human attitudes or poses, as many essay flavors as there are Howard Johnson ice creams. The essayist arises in the morning and, if he has work to do, selects his garb from an unusually extensive wardrobe: he can pull on any sort of shirt, be any sort of person, according to his mood or his subject matter—philosopher, scold, jester, raconteur, confidant, pundit, devil’s advocate, enthusiast. I like the essay, have always liked it, and even as a child was at work, attempting to inflict my young thoughts and experiences on others by putting them on paper. I early broke into print in the pages of St. Nicholas. I tend still to fall back on the essay form (or lack of form) when an idea strikes me, but I am not fooled about the place of the essay in twentieth-century American letters—it stands a short distance down the line. The essayist, unlike the novelist, the poet, and the playwright, must be content in his self-imposed role of second-class citizen. A writer who has his sights trained on the Nobel Prize or other earthly triumphs had best write a novel, a poem, or a play, and leave the essayist to ramble about, content with living a free life and enjoying the satisfactions of a somewhat undisciplined existence. (Dr. Johnson called the essay “an irregular, undigested piece”; this happy practitioner has no wish to quarrel with the good doctor’s characterization.)
Oh, what a blogger E. B. would have been. I laid aside the 11,518th Greatest Book of All Time in favor of the 976th. Even before reading a single essay in that book, I also ordered a rather thin used tome, from a Dallas bookstore, containing two of White’s other essays: “Farewell to Model T” and “From Sea to Shining Sea” about his 1922 trip, when he was just out of college and at loose ends, crossing America in a Ford Model T. Sorry, Shteyngart, there’s someone a short distance down the line I want to meet who has his own road stories to share.